Skip to content
Citizen Impact PortalCitizen Impact Portal

housing

The kingdom that bought its homes

From 47% to 65% in nine years — how Sakani turned a structural homeownership gap into one of Vision 2030’s cleanest delivery arcs, and what the remaining points to the 70% target will actually require.

Editorial Team(Citizen Impact Portal)7 min read

The 18-percentage-point move in Saudi homeownership between 2016 and 2024 is the kind of structural shift that usually takes a generation. The program compressed it into nine years, then ran into the question that follows every successful subsidy: what to do when the easy gains are banked.

Of all the headline numbers Vision 2030 has produced, the homeownership move is the cleanest. In 2016, the share of Saudi citizen households owning their home was roughly 47%. By the end of 2024, it had crossed 65% — an 18-percentage-point shift in nine years, in a market that had been structurally stuck for a generation. The 2030 target of 70% is now genuinely in sight.

What had to be built first

Before 2017, Saudi Arabia did not have a functional retail mortgage market in the sense most developed economies would recognize. SAMA had only authorized Sharia-compliant retail mortgages in 2014; tenors were short; and citizen savings rates were not deep enough to bridge the deposit-to-purchase gap on Riyadh or Jeddah pricing. The Real Estate Development Fund (REDF), founded in 1974, was the historical workhorse — interest-free loans of capped value, with long waiting lists.

The first wave of work, between 2017 and 2019, was on the financing side rather than the building side. SAMA pushed banks toward longer tenors and competitive pricing. REDF was restructured into a primary-mortgage subsidy vehicle rather than a direct lender — guaranteeing and partially subsidizing mortgages issued through commercial banks. The residential lending stock roughly tripled between 2017 and 2024.

How Sakani actually works

Sakani, launched in 2017, sits on top of that financial infrastructure. Administered jointly by MoMAH and REDF, it offers Saudi households three instruments. The first is subsidized mortgages: REDF underwrites the rate differential so a household pays a meaningfully lower effective monthly cost than the bank’s market rate. The second is ready-build housing — pre-constructed units, mostly outside the dense metros. The third is free-land allocation in approved residential zones, sometimes paired with a construction loan.

By 2024 the program had supported well over a million Saudi households across these instruments. The mortgage subsidy is the dominant channel — it scales easiest and matches what most younger Saudi families want, which is to buy on the open market rather than wait for a ready unit.

The supply side

The financing reforms would have stalled if supply hadn’t moved. Three developments matter. First, REDF’s pivot to the subsidized-mortgage model freed private and PIF-affiliated developers to build for a market with actual purchasing power. Second, ROSHN — PIF’s residential platform, launched in 2020 — targeted roughly 400,000 units by 2030, anchored by the Sedra community in northern Riyadh. Third, a generation of mid-tier private developers (Dar Al Arkan, Al Akaria, Retal) scaled their volume of mid-market apartments and villas.

The composition has shifted notably. Saudi housing preference has historically been heavily villa-tilted. By the mid-2020s, the share of new residential contracts written against apartments rather than villas has risen materially, especially in Riyadh, Jeddah, and the Eastern Province. The mathematics of metro density and middle-class affordability point in only one direction, and Saudi household behavior is beginning to follow.

What it means for citizens

For a Saudi household with a stable income and modest deposit savings, the homeownership path in 2026 is substantially better than at any point in the recent past. The combination of a deeper mortgage market, the Sakani subsidy, and a wider range of products — apartments in metros, villas in master-planned communities, ready-build options outside the dense cities — describes a real-options set that didn’t exist in 2017.

The harder version of the question is for the household whose income trajectory doesn’t fit the program’s center of gravity. Sakani is, in effect, a middle-class program. Households below the income threshold rely on more limited social-housing programs; households above it face the full metro pricing reality. The middle is well-served; the shoulders are not, and the question of what comes after the 70% headline target is mostly a question about those shoulders.

Metrics referenced

Continue reading